Geopolitical Tensions and Airspace Risk

Conflicts and security events are increasing aviation and airspace risk by disrupting global flight paths, raising costs, and creating new exposures.

Overview: Three Conflicts

The U.S.-Iran war has disrupted the Gulf region, affecting commercial, cargo, and business aviation traffic across tightly controlled flight corridors. According to AIT Worldwide Logistics, some carriers have suspended service on select routes to and from the region, freighter operations remain highly constrained, and carriers are expanding operations on major global routes to prioritize essential cargo.

Following its invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Russian airspace has been closed to 36 Western countries and their carriers, adding two to four hours to standard trans-Asian routes and increasing costs for fuel, additional crew, and aircraft maintenance. With geopolitical tensions still elevated and no apparent diplomatic path to ending the war, a reopening of the airspace appears unlikely in the foreseeable future.

Rising tensions in the Taiwan Strait have become a critical risk for international flight operators, alongside the Russia-Ukraine war and instability in Middle Eastern airspace. Chinese military patrols, large-scale exercises around Taiwan, changes to civilian flight paths, and temporary no-fly zones can create sudden restrictions, congestion, and uncertainty, forcing airlines to reroute flights.

How Operators Are Managing Conflict-Zone Risk

Scenario Planning

Effective risk management helps airlines anticipate and mitigate the impact of geopolitical tensions. This includes continuously monitoring global developments, assessing operational and financial risks, and developing contingency plans for airspace closures, rerouting, capacity changes, crew briefing protocols, and temporary service suspensions.

Scenario planning should also account for potential changes in fuel prices, currency exchange rates, operating costs, and travel demand. Close coordination with aviation regulators, industry organizations, and local authorities can help airlines stay ahead of airspace restrictions and regulatory changes and respond quickly as conditions evolve.

Technology Implementation

Technology helps operators continually monitor airspace and respond quickly to emerging threats. This includes real-time NOTAM (Notice to Air Missions) alerts, geopolitical risk feeds, airspace closure notifications, and navigation integrity monitoring.

GPS spoofing and jamming have emerged as significant operational risks across multiple Flight Information Regions (FIRs), particularly near conflict zones, affecting navigation, situational awareness, and flight safety. Reports of these incidents have increased sharply in recent years, making them difficult to mitigate through flight planning alone. In some cases, avoiding higher-risk regions may be the most effective risk management strategy.

Reflecting the growing concern, the FAA and EASA have updated operational guidance on GNSS interference, while ICAO, the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), and the International Maritime Organization (IMO) have jointly warned that increasing jamming and spoofing pose a growing threat to aviation and maritime navigation. Operators should ensure flight crews are trained to recognize interference events and follow established contingency procedures.

Insurance Review

Operators should regularly review their insurance program in the face of geopolitical risks, including their War Risk, Kidnap and Ransom (K&R), and Political Risk policies, to identify potential gaps and ensure coverage aligns with current routes, destinations, operations, and passenger profiles.

It’s important to note, for example, that the war in Iran has contributed to volatility in the aviation war-risk market, prompting some insurers to reassess exposures and coverage requirements. War risk coverage terms are becoming more dynamic, with requirements and pricing changing rapidly as geopolitical conditions evolve. Operators in or near the affected regions may encounter heightened underwriting scrutiny, with insurers requiring advance notice of planned operations to assess coverage availability. Depending on real-time geopolitical conditions, underwriters may decline coverage for planned operations in certain regions or impose additional restrictions or premiums as a condition of coverage.

The Risk and Insurance Angle

War Risk Coverage: Hull & Liability Insurance

War Risk coverage presents a fundamental structural difference between general aviation and airline operations.

In the U.S. general aviation market, War Risk coverage is commonly added as an endorsement to an existing Hull & Liability policy and is often included by default in standard insurance quotes for operators of varying sizes. This approach reflects the generally lower frequency and more localized exposure associated with business and general aviation operations.

Airline operations, however, typically purchase War Risk coverage as a standalone policy due to their significantly higher exposure limits, broader international route structures, and more complex underwriting considerations. Airlines operating internationally must navigate a dynamic War Risk market where coverage terms, exclusions, pricing, and capacity can change quickly in response to geopolitical developments. These policies require specialized underwriting expertise and are structured separately from an airline’s primary Hull & Liability program to address the unique exposures that come with operating in higher-risk regions.

K&R and Personal Security Protocols

Business aviation operators flying VVIP or corporate clients into geopolitically sensitive regions may face heightened exposure to kidnapping, ransom, extortion, wrongful detention, and other security threats that standard aviation policies typically do not address. Dedicated K&R coverage can help address these exposures, often providing access to specialized crisis response and security expertise in addition to financial protection.

Operators should also consider pre-trip risk assessments, destination monitoring, secure ground transportation, and emergency response protocols as part of a broader approach to protecting passengers and crew when traveling in higher-risk regions.

Political Risk Insurance

Political Risk Insurance provides operators with protection against adverse political developments, including political violence, government expropriation of assets or operations, restrictions on currency conversion, and credit risks such as non-payment.

Connect with the McGriff Specialty Aviation Practice

The complex risk created by geopolitical conflicts require strategic planning and collaboration with an experienced, innovative broker. McGriff can support operators in assessing evolving risks and developing an insurance program aligned with their exposures.

Sources

  • IATA Airspace Update 2025
  • Aviation Week & Space Technology
  • AIT Worldwide Logistics
  • Control Risks Global Risk Forecast 2026
  • Marsh Aviation Practice

Contributors

Brittney Mallah

Vice President

McGriff Specialty Aviation Practice

Holly Hopkinson

Senior Vice President

McGriff Specialty Aviation Practice

 

Insights